Showing posts with label puns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label puns. Show all posts

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Chocopocalypse

According to an article I read recently, we might be running out of chocolate. To quote one of my favorite bloggers: PANIC!

As a chocoholic, I find the threat of a chocopocalypse deeply distressing. I use chocolate as a stress-reliever, an anti-depressant, a motivator and a reward for productivity--essentially, for everything, always.

As a word nerd, I couldn't pass up the opportunity to write about this to give myself the excuse to make the lovely porte-manteau in the title. Sorry y'all.

Fortunately, unlike in the case of endangered honey and mysteriously vanishing bees, a chocopocalypse is still reversible. Basically, the cocoa plant is a pain in the ass to grow, and not profitable enough considering the effort, so farmers abandon it in favor of alternate cash crops. The result is that the current demand is overwhelming the supply, so unless something changes, we'll eat through our stores until there is nary a Worther Bud or a Nestle Bittersweet chip left to nosh on.

In conclusion, savor those Hersheys bars (except Hersheys is honestly pretty shit, so I'd go Godiva or at least Cadbury's if I were you, but to each her own indulgence). You never know, a few years from now our children could be asking us "you actually tried chocolate?!?" in the same way we incredulously ask our parents if they remember life without color tv. By that point, there will be a whole new level of the "fiction" of Charlie's Chocolate Factory and Chocolat beyond oompa loompas and impossibly debonair river gypsies. And I have to admit, the death by chocolate river drowning (à la Augustus Gloop) will not seem nearly so horrible in the face of a chocolate-less existence.

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

My fifteen minutes of fashionista fame

So coming to me for me for fashion advice would normally be like consulting a LOLcat for grammar (can haz hanging participle?). But the situation has become dire, and if no one else is going to expose the inappropriate exposure of this fashion blunder then I'm just going to have to suit up and step up.


Ahem.


Leggings and tights are called "leggings" and "tights" because they are NOT PANTS! They are not a stand-alone article of clothing.


Don’t get me wrong; I rocked the leggings look all through my childhood. And now that my childhood is making a fashion comeback, I myself own a few pairs. However, there are strict rules governing their adult usage, and here are the acceptable cases:


Under age 10? Definitely. (But don’t be that weird kid that takes too long to make the switchover to jeans after that. That was totally me, and looking at photos, it wasn’t pretty.)

I'm the shrimpy one in the middle channeling a green Where's Waldo


Under a dress? Perfectly acceptable.

With boots, a belt and a baggy sweater? Sure.

Although the lady on the far right has taken the robe look dangerously far into jedi knight territory


Under shorts? Cute.

This look always reminds me of Mickey Mouse


The last appropriate usage is any sort of theatrical use. Dance routines get a pass, as do any Halloween tributes to Freddie Mercury, David Bowie or the like.


When I was in third grade I used to laminate all of my notebooks

in holographic contact paper that looked exactly like these leggings.


Unfortunately, it seems that lately the boots, the dress hemlines and the sweaters have all been shrinking, leaving me faced with faced with more detailed information about strangers’ anatomy then I would ever want. If you wear your leggings like Snooki, then you're as big of a flop as she would have been less than a second after this photo was taken.


In summary, the key concept to take away from this is UNDER (or over, but only as in I am so over camel toe). Feel free to rock those leggings, tights or jeggings, but remember: if they're not beneath something, the style's beneath you.


And now I'm sure you're all underwhelmed with my layering punnery. Over and out.